Standpoint Theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Standpoint guess - Essay causeStandpoint Theory provides epistemic advantage for different academic handle, when informants/characters are empowered to accurately hash out and analyze their social positions, so that they can change the status quo and improve their social status, although the theory essential also address its conceptual and methodological weaknesses to become a dependable resource for feminist epistemology.Sandra Harding describes the semipolitical commitments of Standpoint Theory and two sources of controversial views in Standpoint Theories Productively Controversial. She argues that the political commitments of Standpoint Theory are 1) the daily lives of the oppressed provide a richer standstill for social analysis than the experiences of the privileged 2) standpoint theorists study up because they deconstruct the realities and needs of the underprivileged 3) the theory promotes collective achievement in discernment how social dealing operate and 4) the the ory seeks to obtain data that is accurate, exhaustive, objective, and intersectional (Harding 194-195). Furthermore, the two sources of controversial principles are the changing political agenda of feminists and the clash of different disciplines and their related epistemology and ontology (Harding 196-197). Harding argues that feminists must see Standpoint Theory from a contextualized multidisciplinary view and accept face pack as a legitimate source of different understandings, and not as a limitation to feminist analysis (Harding 198). She concludes that Standpoint Theory has a significant role in diverse science fields because it emphasizes attention on troubling social realities and uneven social relations. This obligate is important in discussing the controversies that snub the intersectional value of Standpoint Theory. It has the weakness of poor empirical testing of its analyses by dint of applying Hardings propositions to womens groups.... Harding argues that feminists must see Standpoint Theory from a contextualized multidisciplinary view and accept plurality as a legitimate source of different understandings, and not as a limitation to feminist analysis (Harding 198). She concludes that Standpoint Theory has a significant role in diverse science fields because it emphasizes attention on troubling social realities and uneven social relations. This article is important in discussing the controversies that undercut the intersectional value of Standpoint Theory. It has the weakness of poor empirical testing of its analyses through applying Hardings propositions to womens groups. Elizabeth Anderson criticizes Lisa Schwartzmans Challenging Liberalism (2006) in Toward a Non-Ideal, Relational Methodology for Political Philosophy Comments on Schwartzmans Challenging Liberalism. Anderson agrees with Schwartzmans positive agenda of political philosophy, specifically the latters standpoint methodology and group relations methodology. She affirms that Schw artzman is right in her criticisms of individualism and abstraction too because they are incompatible with group relations methodology and standpoint methodology, respectively (Anderson 131). On the contrary, Anderson disagrees with Schwartzmans view on liberalism. Anderson argues that liberalism is consistent with Schwartzmans methods because liberals have utilize them and liberal normative commitments promote the use of these methods (Anderson 131). Anderson contends that liberalism is based on a level of timidity on the capability of the state in resolving all injustices, especially considering differences in how people see what is candid in their operations of informal social values (131). The